Contexts architecture
This document describes the internal architecture of KiCI’s deployment context system, including the data model, protection rule pipeline, scope resolution algorithm, and the held-run lifecycle.
Data model
Section titled “Data model”Core tables (orchestrator DB)
Section titled “Core tables (orchestrator DB)”contexts id UUID PK org_id TEXT NOT NULL name TEXT NOT NULL type TEXT NOT NULL ('fixed' | 'glob') glob_pattern TEXT enabled BOOLEAN DEFAULT true branch_restrictions JSONB DEFAULT '[]' trigger_type_filters JSONB DEFAULT '[]' repo_patterns JSONB DEFAULT '[]' concurrency_limit INTEGER concurrency_strategy TEXT DEFAULT 'queue' concurrency_timeout_ms INTEGER DEFAULT 1800000 required_reviewers JSONB wait_timer_seconds INTEGER hold_expiry_seconds INTEGER allow_local_execution BOOLEAN DEFAULT false created_by TEXT created_at TIMESTAMPTZ updated_at TIMESTAMPTZ UNIQUE(org_id, name)
context_variables id UUID PK org_id TEXT NOT NULL context_id UUID FK -> contexts key TEXT NOT NULL value TEXT NOT NULL locked BOOLEAN DEFAULT false UNIQUE(context_id, key)
context_source_overrides id UUID PK org_id TEXT NOT NULL context_id UUID FK -> contexts routing_key TEXT NOT NULL key TEXT NOT NULL value TEXT NOT NULL UNIQUE(context_id, routing_key, key)
held_runs id UUID PK org_id TEXT NOT NULL run_id TEXT NOT NULL job_id TEXT NOT NULL context_id UUID FK -> contexts hold_type TEXT NOT NULL reason TEXT NOT NULL status TEXT DEFAULT 'pending' approved_by TEXT resolved_at TIMESTAMPTZ expires_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL created_at TIMESTAMPTZScoped secrets (orchestrator DB)
Section titled “Scoped secrets (orchestrator DB)”Secrets use a scope-based organization model:
scoped_secrets id UUID PK org_id TEXT NOT NULL scope TEXT NOT NULL -- e.g., 'aws/prod', 'databases/postgres' key TEXT NOT NULL -- e.g., 'DB_PASSWORD' ...encryption fields... UNIQUE(org_id, scope, key)
context_bindings id UUID PK org_id TEXT NOT NULL context_id UUID FK -> contexts scope_pattern TEXT NOT NULL -- glob pattern, e.g., 'aws/prod/**'Dispatch flow
Section titled “Dispatch flow”The context evaluation is integrated into the orchestrator’s webhook processing pipeline:
Webhook arrives | v1. Dedup check2. Provider normalize3. Lock file fetch4. Changed files check5. Trigger matching (workflows)6. Secret resolution (workflow-level, legacy)7. Per-job context evaluation: | v 7a. Resolve context name (static from lock file, or via init phase for dynamic) 7b. Look up context in DB (ContextStore.matchContext) - Fixed: exact name match - Glob: picomatch pattern match 7c. Evaluate protection rules (sequential pipeline) - Branch gate -> Trust gate -> Concurrency gate -> Reviewer gate -> Timer gate 7d. On reject: mark job as rejected, set error_message 7e. On hold/wait/queue: create held_run, skip dispatch 7f. On pass: resolve environment variables (VariableStore) 7g. Resolve per-context secrets (SecretResolver)8. Build job config with context data9. Dispatch to agent (or queue)Registration-time satisfiability
Section titled “Registration-time satisfiability”Before the dispatch flow ever runs, a manual workflow registration is checked for provably-unsatisfiable multi-context bindings. For each job that binds two or more static context names, the orchestrator resolves each name and intersects the statically-decidable gates — context existence, the enabled flag, and the fixed (non-glob) branch / trigger-type / repository restriction sets. When an intersection is provably empty (a missing or disabled context, or two contexts restricted to disjoint fixed branch sets), the registration is rejected with a precise message naming the job, the contexts, and the rule. Bindings whose restrictions use globs are undecidable here and are left to the dispatch-time all-must-pass gate. This is a proactive check layered on top of the dispatch-time catch-all, not a replacement for it.
Per-job bound-context persistence
Section titled “Per-job bound-context persistence”Each job’s ordered bound-context name list is persisted on its execution_jobs.contexts column (a JSON-encoded string[]). It is written at dispatch with the statically-resolved names — an impure dynamic element it cannot resolve yet is stored as a (dynamic) placeholder — and overwritten with the agent-resolved names when a deferred-init evaluation resolves dynamic elements. The dashboard reads this column to render the bound-context chips on the run detail and run list views.
Dynamic field resolution
Section titled “Dynamic field resolution”When a lock file job has dynamic fields (dynamicContext, dynamicEnv, or dynamicConcurrencyGroup set to true), the orchestrator resolves them before dispatch. There are two resolution paths:
Inline evaluation (schema v11+, LockInlineValue)
Section titled “Inline evaluation (schema v11+, LockInlineValue)”When a dynamic field’s value is a LockInlineValue (a pure function serialized as an inline expression), the orchestrator evaluates it directly without dispatching a separate init job. The processor checks isLockInlineValue() on context, env, and concurrencyGroup fields and evaluates the inline expression at the orchestrator. This is the preferred path for simple pure functions.
Two-phase init model (complex dynamic functions)
Section titled “Two-phase init model (complex dynamic functions)”When a dynamic field is true but its value is not a LockInlineValue, the orchestrator uses a two-phase init model:
Phase 1 — Init:
- Orchestrator dispatches a lightweight
__init__<workflow>__<job>job to a builder agent - Agent loads the compiled bundle and extracts the workflow/job
- Agent calls the dynamic function(s) with the normalized webhook event
- Agent reports resolved values via
job.statuswithdata.initResult - Orchestrator receives:
{ contextName?, env?, concurrencyGroup? }
Phase 2 — Resolution + execution: 6. Orchestrator treats resolved values as static — full context lookup, protection rules, secret resolution, variable merge all proceed normally 7. A fresh execution job is dispatched with everything resolved
Key properties (both paths):
- All dynamic fields resolved before dispatch
- Mixed static/dynamic fields are supported (e.g., static
context+ dynamicenv) - Hold/wait/queue behavior is identical to static contexts (orchestrator handles after resolution)
Key properties (two-phase init only):
- All dynamic fields resolved in a single init call (no separate callbacks per field)
- Init runner runs in its own agent process — user code never executes in the orchestrator
- Dynamic function evaluation has a 60-second timeout (configurable per-job)
- If a dynamic function throws, the job fails immediately
- If a dynamic function returns undefined, the job proceeds without that field
- Init results are NOT cacheable (functions may be non-deterministic)
Protection rule pipeline
Section titled “Protection rule pipeline”Gates are evaluated sequentially. The first non-pass result stops evaluation:
evaluateProtectionRules(env, ctx, runningCount, concurrencyGroup, trustTier?) | 1. Context disabled? -> reject 2. Branch gate: - env.branchRestrictions is empty -> pass - ctx.branch matches any restriction -> pass - else -> reject("Branch 'X' not allowed") 3. Trust gate: - env has no trust requirements -> pass - trustTier meets minimum requirement -> pass - else -> reject or hold(holdType: 'security') 4. Concurrency gate: - env.concurrencyLimit is null or non-positive -> pass (unlimited) - runningCount < limit -> pass - strategy = 'cancel-pending' -> queue(holdType: 'concurrency', reason: 'cancel-pending', caller handles cancellation) - strategy = 'queue' -> queue(holdType: 'concurrency') 5. Reviewer gate: - env.requiredReviewers is null/empty -> pass - else -> hold(holdType: 'reviewer') 6. Wait timer gate: - env.waitTimerSeconds is null -> pass - else -> wait(holdType: 'timer', holdUntil: now + timer) | v ProtectionGateResult { action, reason, holdType?, holdUntil? }Gate result types
Section titled “Gate result types”| Action | Meaning | Effect |
|---|---|---|
pass | Gate satisfied | Continue to next gate |
reject | Gate failed permanently | Job rejected, error_message set |
hold | Awaiting human action | held_run created, job pending |
wait | Time-based delay | held_run created with expiry |
queue | Concurrency full | Job queued, dispatched when slot opens |
Multiple bound contexts
Section titled “Multiple bound contexts”A job can bind an ordered list of contexts (contexts: [...] in the lock as contexts: [{ value, dynamic }]). On every dispatch:
- Resolution + merge. Each context is resolved independently with the per-context logic above, then the per-context secret and variable maps are folded in array order — a later context’s key overrides an earlier one (last-wins). The folded set flows into the single
secrets/contextVarsdispatch fields, so the agent-side injection is unchanged. - All-must-pass gate aggregation. Bound names with no configured context are skipped first (they contribute nothing — the established lenient behavior). The hard reject gates (enabled, branch, trigger-type, repo) must then pass for every configured bound context; the first failing one produces a rejection naming the offending context and rule. The hold/wait/queue parameters aggregate most-restrictively: minimum trust = max tier, required reviewers = union, wait timer = max, hold expiry = min, concurrency limit = min. The aggregated parameters are evaluated through the same gate pipeline on a synthetic effective context, so adding an context can never loosen access.
- Skip-on-test. For a test/local run, bound contexts whose
allow_local_executionis false are dropped before gate evaluation and merge; if all are dropped the job runs with no context-scoped variables and a warning. - Concurrency grouping. The default concurrency group is the first bound context’s name; the run’s
contextcolumn records that group.
Scope resolution algorithm
Section titled “Scope resolution algorithm”When resolving secrets for an context, the scope resolver uses a longest-path-wins strategy:
Given context bindings: aws/** -> binds scope 'aws' and all sub-scopes aws/prod/** -> binds scope 'aws/prod' and sub-scopes
Secrets in DB: aws/shared : AWS_REGION = us-east-1 aws/prod : AWS_REGION = eu-west-1 aws/prod : DB_PASSWORD = secret123
Resolution for context 'production' (bound to both patterns): AWS_REGION = eu-west-1 (aws/prod wins over aws/shared, longer path) DB_PASSWORD = secret123 (only in aws/prod)The algorithm:
- Collect all scope patterns bound to the context
- For each pattern, find matching secrets using picomatch glob matching
- Sort matched secrets by scope path length (descending)
- Build flat map: last-write-wins on key collisions (longest path = highest priority)
Test-run access (allow_local_execution)
Section titled “Test-run access (allow_local_execution)”Each context carries an allow_local_execution flag (default false) that gates whether a remote test run (kici run remote) may target the context and resolve its secrets.
When the orchestrator resolves secrets for a test run, it combines the developer’s CLI-uploaded local secrets (sent encrypted with the run) with test-context secrets resolved from scoped_secrets. The test-context side is filtered by allow_local_execution:
- The job’s own declared
contextand each fixturesecrets: { ctx: envName }mapping resolve secrets only when the target context hasallow_local_execution = true. Static strings and pure inlinecontextexpressions both participate — the inline expression is evaluated against the fixture’s simulated event and the resolved name goes through the same gate. Impure dynamic contexts (init-job marker) are not evaluated for test runs and contribute no context-resolved secrets. - The gate applies to all remote test runs: a run whose matched workflow targets an context with the flag off is rejected before dispatch.
- A fixture mapping that points a context at a missing context, or at one whose flag is off, rejects the run (fail-closed).
- On a key collision, the CLI-uploaded local value wins over the test-context value, giving a per-run override.
Production contexts left at the default false are therefore never reachable by a test run. Operators set the flag with kici-admin context set-policy --allow-local-execution true|false or through the dashboard’s per-context test-runs toggle.
7-layer environment variable merge
Section titled “7-layer environment variable merge”The agent’s buildSanitizedEnv function merges variables in this precedence order (last wins):
Layer 1: Allowed system vars -- PATH, HOME, USER (from agent process)Layer 2: Sandbox defaults -- FORCE_COLOR=1Layer 3: Orchestrator-supplied env -- the dispatch's `env` fieldLayer 4: Org-level context vars -- from contexts DB tableLayer 5: Source-level overrides -- from context_source_overrides (skips locked vars)Layer 6: Job env -- from SDK env property (static or evaluated)Layer 7: setEnv() calls -- runtime modifications within stepsLayers 4-5 are resolved at the orchestrator and passed in job.dispatch. Layer 6 comes from the lock file (static) or from the init phase result (dynamic — resolved before dispatch via the two-phase init model). Layer 7 is agent-side only. Dynamic env vars land at layer 6 with the same precedence as static env vars.
Secrets are NOT injected as environment variables. They flow through IPC and are accessed via ctx.secrets.get() and ctx.secrets.has(). Users can explicitly inject a secret into process.env by calling ctx.secrets.expose('KEY'), but this is opt-in and happens at step execution time.
Held-run lifecycle
Section titled “Held-run lifecycle”A protection gate holds a run or job at the held status — a non-terminal member of both ExecutionRunStatus and ExecutionJobStatus. The orchestrator’s execution tracker owns these status transitions:
held / \ v vpending -> queued -> running -> success \-> failed \-> cancelled
held status: awaiting approval / timer -> approval satisfied -> queued -> running -> rejection -> cancelled -> expiry (hold_expiry_seconds exceeded) -> cancelledThe held status is non-terminal. It resolves to queued once the gate is satisfied (a reviewer approves, or a timer elapses).
Dashboard CRUD
Section titled “Dashboard CRUD”Context management in the dashboard goes through the same REST-over-WS proxy pattern KiCI uses for the rest of the dashboard surface.
Lock file schema
Section titled “Lock file schema”The lock file (v6+) includes per-job context fields. Schema v11 added LockInlineValue as an alternative to the two-phase init model for pure function evaluation:
{ "jobs": [ { "name": "deploy", "context": "production", "dynamicContext": false, "env": { "DEPLOY_TARGET": "us-east-1" }, "dynamicEnv": false, "concurrencyGroup": "production-api", "dynamicConcurrencyGroup": false } ]}context— static context name (string) or inline expression (LockInlineValue, schema v11+)dynamicContext—truewhen context is a function (resolved via inline evaluation or two-phase init)env— static environment variables (Record<string, string>) or inline expression (LockInlineValue, schema v11+)dynamicEnv—truewhen env is a functionconcurrencyGroup— static concurrency group name (string) or inline expression (LockInlineValue, schema v11+)dynamicConcurrencyGroup—truewhen concurrencyGroup is a function